
Do Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II uh... not have the middle Indicatrix?
Re: Do Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II uh... not have the middle Indicatrix?
Can you state a source where Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II are defined as having no middle Indicatrix?
Re: Do Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II uh... not have the middle Indicatrix?
So, why does Geocart depict Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II as having no middle Indicatrix?
-
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 2:43 am
Re: Do Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II uh... not have the middle Indicatrix?
Piotr, it’s simply a bug. The same bug was to be found in a different projection a while ago (can’t remember anymore which projection it was).
A workaround is to set the center longitude to 0°0'0.0036"E, but I’m sure the bug will be fixed in the next Geocart version.
Edit: Apparently, the workaround only works for van der Grinten I, van der Grinten II seems to need a higher value, e.g. 0°5'E.
A workaround is to set the center longitude to 0°0'0.0036"E, but I’m sure the bug will be fixed in the next Geocart version.
Edit: Apparently, the workaround only works for van der Grinten I, van der Grinten II seems to need a higher value, e.g. 0°5'E.
Re: Do Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II uh... not have the middle Indicatrix?
Here's a zoom into the Van Der Grinten II, up to 0.2° north, east, south, and west, rendered in Draft. Each white pixel is undefined.


Re: Do Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II uh... not have the middle Indicatrix?
These two projections are extremely troublesome around the origin. 25 years ago, when I implemented them, I spent a lot of time trying to work out a series development for longitude close to the prime meridian and latitude close to 0 within that. I only managed a partial solution.
I’m a little more experienced at this now. They’re fixed, but it was still a lot of frustrating work. The projections defined by graphical procedures using straight-edge and compass all suffer regions of problematic numerics (Fournier, Nicolosi globular &c).
— daan
I’m a little more experienced at this now. They’re fixed, but it was still a lot of frustrating work. The projections defined by graphical procedures using straight-edge and compass all suffer regions of problematic numerics (Fournier, Nicolosi globular &c).
— daan
Re: Do Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II uh... not have the middle Indicatrix?
I can sympathize. In my very crude program, written in BASIC, suitable only for drawing illustrative maps of the whole world, what I've done in such cases is, for a degree or so around the problematic parallel or meridian, to approximate the circles of radius unreasonably large by parabolas. No further terms in the power series.daan wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 4:49 pmThese two projections are extremely troublesome around the origin. 25 years ago, when I implemented them, I spent a lot of time trying to work out a series development for longitude close to the prime meridian and latitude close to 0 within that. I only managed a partial solution.
And, as yet, I've made no attempt to try to calculate the Tissot indicatrix, let alone isoclines, whatsoever.
Re: Do Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II uh... not have the middle Indicatrix?
Wouldn't it cause a problematic discontinuity in the map?quadibloc wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 11:49 amI can sympathize. In my very crude program, written in BASIC, suitable only for drawing illustrative maps of the whole world, what I've done in such cases is, for a degree or so around the problematic parallel or meridian, to approximate the circles of radius unreasonably large by parabolas. No further terms in the power series.daan wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 4:49 pmThese two projections are extremely troublesome around the origin. 25 years ago, when I implemented them, I spent a lot of time trying to work out a series development for longitude close to the prime meridian and latitude close to 0 within that. I only managed a partial solution.
And, as yet, I've made no attempt to try to calculate the Tissot indicatrix, let alone isoclines, whatsoever.
Re: Do Van Der Grinten I and Van Der Grinten II uh... not have the middle Indicatrix?
It causes a discontinuity unless more steps are taken to smooth it out. The discontinuity isn’t normally “problematic” unless the series development is not sufficiently accurate.Piotr wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:05 pmWouldn't it cause a problematic discontinuity in the map?quadibloc wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 11:49 amI can sympathize. In my very crude program, written in BASIC, suitable only for drawing illustrative maps of the whole world, what I've done in such cases is, for a degree or so around the problematic parallel or meridian, to approximate the circles of radius unreasonably large by parabolas. No further terms in the power series.daan wrote: ↑Sun Apr 05, 2020 4:49 pmThese two projections are extremely troublesome around the origin. 25 years ago, when I implemented them, I spent a lot of time trying to work out a series development for longitude close to the prime meridian and latitude close to 0 within that. I only managed a partial solution.
And, as yet, I've made no attempt to try to calculate the Tissot indicatrix, let alone isoclines, whatsoever.
— daan